Lie #3: The more story rules I break, the more original and unique my story will be.
Â
I’ve found a fascinating paradox when working with all kinds of newer screenwriters.
Â
Writers assume they’re being original when they’re breaking story rules, however, all writers end up breaking screenwriting rules in the EXACT SAME WAY.
Â
Every writer tries a nontraditional structure.
Â
Every writer uses vague clues to make the audience interested in the plot, without actually telling them what’s going on.
Â
Every writer writes a story where the protagonist doesn’t have a clear goal.
Â
Every writer uses multiple timelines and flashbacks to make the script feel more interesting.
Â
Every writer tries to write a story without an obvious antagonist.
Â
When writers try to “break away from the stifling rules” what they end up doing every time is making amateur mistakes.
Â
Writers love finding films that are “exceptions” to writing principles and point them out the second someone brings up a story rule.
Â
I understand the motivation behind this sort of thing.
Â
Writers want to create unique stories, and they believe that story rules create formulaic, copy-and-paste stories for mass audiences.
Â
But this is simply not true.
Â
Truth #3: Stories do not fail or succeed based on how "original" they are. Stories fail or succeed based on the writer’s ability to say something meaningful through the story.
Â